Improve FPGA comparison tables
This commit is contained in:
parent
239106c2fd
commit
89f0a1565e
2 changed files with 20 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -338,3 +338,5 @@ minimum height=1cm, align=center, text width=3cm, draw=black, fill=blue!30]
|
|||
bottom=0pt
|
||||
}
|
||||
\newcommand{\icode}[1]{\codeBox{\texttt{#1}}}
|
||||
|
||||
\usepackage{booktabs}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -15,28 +15,42 @@ As a starting point, a Terasic DE0 development board\footnote{\url{https://www.t
|
|||
|
||||
The only method of synthesis for Altera devices is to use the proprietary Quartus IDE. However, the last version of Quartus to support the Cyclone III series of FPGAs (version 13.1) had already been out of date for several years at the start of the project. Because of this and the increasing resource demand of the developing core, an Arty A7-35T development board\footnote{\url{https://store.digilentinc.com/arty-a7-artix-7-fpga-development-board-for-makers-and-hobbyists/}} with a Xilinx Artix-7\footnote{\url{https://www.xilinx.com/products/silicon-devices/fpga/artix-7.html}} FPGA was ordered from Digilent.
|
||||
|
||||
The two FPGAs compare as follows:
|
||||
A comparison between the two FPGAs themselves can be seen in \autoref{tab:fpga-comparison}, a comparison between the peripherals on the development boards in \autoref{tab:devboard-comparison}.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{l r r}
|
||||
\begin{table}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{l|r|r}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
& Altera EP3C16 & Xilinx XC7A35T \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
Logic Elements & 15000 & 33280 \\
|
||||
Multipliers & 56 & 90 \\
|
||||
Block RAM (kb) & 504 & 1800 \\
|
||||
PLLs & 4 & 5 \\
|
||||
Global clocks & 20 & 32 \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Comparison between Altera and Xilinx FPGAs}
|
||||
\label{tab:fpga-comparison}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
The periphery on the development boards:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[h]
|
||||
\centering
|
||||
\begin{tabular}{l|r|r}
|
||||
\toprule
|
||||
& Terasic DE0 & Digilent Arty A7-35T \\
|
||||
\midrule
|
||||
Switches & 10 & 4 \\
|
||||
Buttons & 3 & 4 \\
|
||||
LEDs & 10 + 4x 7-segment & 4 + 3 RGB \\
|
||||
GPIOs & 2x 36 & 4x PMOD + chipKIT \\
|
||||
Memory & 8MB SDRAM & 256MB DDR3L \\
|
||||
Others & SD card, VGA & Ethernet \\
|
||||
\bottomrule
|
||||
\end{tabular}
|
||||
\caption{Comparison between the peripherals on Terasic and Digilent FPGA development boards}
|
||||
\label{tab:devboard-comparison}
|
||||
\end{table}
|
||||
|
||||
While the Digilent board offers fewer IO options, the DDR3 memory can be interfaced using Free memory cores and allows for much larger programs to be loaded, possibly even a full operating system. The missing VGA port has been substituted by a HDMI-compatible DVI interface that is accessible through one of the high-speed PMOD connectors.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue